I'm curious as to why this band doesn't put on longer shows. They have the catalog to put on a 2 - 2/1/2 hour show a night, but they don't.
I'm also surprised they don't vary the setlists more, too.
I'm not knocking the band at all, this is not a negative thread...just putting it out there. What are your thoughts? And don't say, "It perfect the way it is...or...They can do what they want"...no fluff answers, please.
QuoteI'm curious as to why this band doesn't put on longer shows. They have the catalog to put on a 2 - 2/1/2 hour show a night, but they don't.
I'm also surprised they don't vary the setlists more, too.
I'm not knocking the band at all, this is not a negative thread...just putting it out there. What are your thoughts? And don't say, "It perfect the way it is...or...They can do what they want"...no fluff answers, please.
1. Have you looked at the shows page and seen how many shows have been played in the past few years? Would you want to put on 3+ hour shows for the hell of it?
2. I get tired watching them play for a few minutes. Can you imagine the toll it takes physically to play like that, night after night after night?
3. Despite your plea for "no fluff answers", they do what they do. Not everyone is Guided by Voices or the Dead...
There's another thread around here about the setlists... but maybe it's actually in a thread about a particular show and this was discussed. Can't remember.
Anyway, one of the takes is that they are mostly focusing on "Z" material, similar to the tour that they did when ISM came out. Then, hopefully, in the Spring they will tour again and vary the setlists up some like they did after the first ISM tour when they started playing "Cobra" and stuff like that.
i see what youre saying, yeah itd be great to have longer shows, but they put so much in to it, i dont think they could pull it off consistently. to tie in with another thread, they dont do enough drugs like ween to put on 3 plus hour shows all the time. not that theres anything wrong with that.
waxy- this is a perfect example of how Pearl Jam has spoiled a lot of their fans. Pearl Jam plays these epic 3 hour shows and no 2 shows have the same setlist. if you look back to when they were supporting Vitalogy, their shows were right around 1 hour 45 or 2 hours
I think the chronological order is more important to MMJ. They view an album as a complete experience so they attempt to keep it intact as much as possible.
Its perfect the way it is.
They can do what they want.
johnconaway
1. Have you looked at the shows page and seen how many shows have been played in the past few years? Would you want to put on 3+ hour shows for the hell of it?
other bands have done it and still do it. its not the norm, but this is a pretty weak argument
2. I get tired watching them play for a few minutes. Can you imagine the toll it takes physically to play like that, night after night after night?
um....
try digging ditches or laying brick as a profession. performing rock star doesn't sound too bad.
3. Despite your plea for "no fluff answers", they do what they do. Not everyone is Guided by Voices or the Dead...
so, by your way of thinking, if a band plays 3 hour shows and has varied setlists- they are possessed?
Quote
Its perfect the way it is.
They can do what they want.
mitch just rolled over in his grave
I bet that the Louisville setlist will be epic. I know the Palace has a curfew but hopefully they'll only let VHS or BETA have a few songs since all their songs sound alike anyway.
QuoteI bet that the Louisville setlist will be epic. I know the Palace has a curfew but hopefully they'll only let VHS or BETA have a few songs since all their songs sound alike anyway.
Hey now. I am REALLY excited about VHS or BETA. Maybe we could stop the negatudes about them, hey? :)
What's the Palace curfew?
completely unrelated to most of the stuff mentioned...a lot of places have those annoying curfews. for instance, the venue i saw them at turned into a nightclub at like 11 so mmj had to be off by like 10.30 at the latest.
it seems like they tend to throw in jim solo sets or a few more songs when theres no curfew
Sorry, had to get that off my chest abut VHS or BETA, they are really nice guys and I am really happy about their success I just don't particular like their style, but that's enough, you're right.
I don't know the actual time of the Palace curfew but when I saw MMJ / Wilco Jeff Tweedy said that they wanted to make sure they got to their last song before the curfew. I don't hink it's obscene but it's there.
{Sidebar} I saw Neil Young play in Cincy one time and he was pissed that they told him he had to stop at a certein time so he played for like a half hour and closed with "Piece of Crap". It was a piece of crap too, but i doubt anything like that will occur at our show.
Quote
I think the chronological order is more important to MMJ. They view an album as a complete experience so they attempt to keep it intact as much as possible.
I think you're right. I guess Jim mixes it up a bit more when he does solo shows.
Quote
other bands have done it and still do it. its not the norm, but this is a pretty weak argument
um....
try digging ditches or laying brick as a profession. performing rock star doesn't sound too bad.
so, by your way of thinking, if a band plays 3 hour shows and has varied setlists- they are possessed?
Everyone else is doing it! Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Have you been to any headlining concerts in the past 10 or so years? Shows are much shorter these days. The longest sets that I've seen have been GBV or the Dead. Santana is another exception, but most shows I've seen clock in around 1.5 to 2 hours.
So now we're comparing being a rock star to ditch digging? By that logic, everything is easy.
What's that got to do with anything?
imagining a ditch digger, putting the soul and emotion of a Jacket show into his/her ditch.
it's a nice thought
and a very cool looking ditch
Fuck SONY music and corporate greed
I'm so sorry to do this, but this:
Quoteso, by your way of thinking, if a band plays 3 hour shows and has varied setlists- they are possessed?
I just got that. That's really funny.
I like your kind of ditch digger, zycartrobz. ;)
Quote
Everyone else is doing it! Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Have you been to any headlining concerts in the past 10 or so years? Shows are much shorter these days. The longest sets that I've seen have been GBV or the Dead. Santana is another exception, but most shows I've seen clock in around 1.5 to 2 hours.
So now we're comparing being a rock star to ditch digging? By that logic, everything is easy.
What's that got to do with anything?
ween! theyre known for playing at least 2 1/2 hours, if not three or more. even though it was a rare thing, i personally witnessed a dan bern show that clocked in about 3 hours and 20 minutes.
dont say no one is doing it, is a rare thing, but it happens.
Now, the last time I saw RUSH (last year), they played 3 hours (with a 15 minute intermission). So, I guess that's 2:45 minutes.
Of course, they have 20+ albums and a couple of their songs were 10 plus minutes.
They still rock.
Fuck SONY music and corporate greed.
i once saw the Fat Albert Jug Band play for like 32 hours straight but i had eaten like 2 lbs. of mushrooms at the time
I think the most legendary example is Bruce Springstein. Back in the day he apparently would play shows that were 5 or 6 hours if he had nowhere to go that night. That might be just a legend but the Boss can play forever too.
Of course he doesn't hold a candle to Fat Albert.
Well, I'll not speak too much on changing the setlist up, because I think alot of people know how I feel about from The Portland Show post. I think it's important to remember that a concert is not JUST for the band. THere is an audience there too. THey are fans who pay money to see the show. When you have fans they travel to catch 2 or 3 shows per tour, that's something special. THe band should realize this a bit more. Of course, after to Portland Show thread started they played the SD show, which had a mind-boggling setlist, very diffrent from almost every other show on tour. Maybe the bands been checkin' out the boards, and wanted to show me wrong.
That being said, the length of the shows are perfect. 2 hour shows are just the right length I feel. Some bands come out, play an hour set, then do a 1 song encore. BORING! But not our boys. I think the problem here is a trickle down effect from the 'jam band' connection some people have made. Sure, I saw Phish a few times, and they played for 3-4 hours. But if you look at setlists, MMJ playes more songs per show then Phish did. Phish just stretched the songs out to 10-20 minutes. THat's not MMJ's thing. THey jam on stage on occation, but they are not trying to bend your mind musicly, they are trying to melt your face with the RAWK!!!!
Despite my setlist complaint I still feel MMJ is the best live show to see right now, period. 10 years from now, I hope to be saying the same thing! ;D
PapaJoeBear
ween vs. MMJ....who would win that slugfest?
Quoteween vs. MMJ....who would win that slugfest?
an actual slugfest, or who could inhale more scotchguard? ;D
Quote
an actual slugfest, or who could inhale more scotchguard? ;D
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice. ;)