Main Menu

Lady Gaga?

Started by rincon, May 26, 2011, 03:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rincon

Quote from: capt. scotty on May 26, 2011, 07:30 PM
Quote from: rincon on May 26, 2011, 06:22 PM
Quote from: Tracy 2112 on May 26, 2011, 04:59 PM
Quote from: rincon on May 26, 2011, 02:00 PM
Yeah, I remember all that too. The difference is she was on the same level as Prince and Michael Jackson,(All three were born in the same summer) so she did not stick out as much, as Lady Gaga seems to have the limelight almost to herself. I think after 4 or 5 albums Madonna was clearly bigger than the other 2.

Madonna clearly bigger than Michael Jackson? Never. I don't think anyone has ever gotten bigger than Michael Jackson.
She continued to release music while he did not. After Bad he never had any real success. She may not be bigger in a historical sense, bur she was far more popular and relevant after the 80's.

Yeah...MJ also had four #1 singles before Madonna was 12 years old. Nine #1 songs before Madonna had her first.

He's the freaking King Of Pop, man
I started this thread about Lady Gaga having all this media exposure, and she is only releasing her second album. It then led to comparisons to Madonna. That led to comparisons to MJ. Does that mean the media hype regarding Lady Gaga is irrelevant because Michael Jackson is the King of Pop? We could bring in Sinatra, the Beatles, Elvis, and even Hitler. Just not Elvis Hitler. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_Hitler

Tracy 2112

Quote from: rincon on May 26, 2011, 07:20 PM
Well, I did not do sales research. All I know is after Bad he had no ubiquitous presence in the media that was not negative, or songs that someone like me who is not a fan  were overexposed to.

Oh, OK. When you said "After Bad he (Michael Jackson) never had any real success", I thought you meant > after Bad he (Michael Jackson) never had any real success.

I was actually supposed to somehow magically read into your statement that what you meant was"after Bad he had no ubiquitous presence in the media that was not negative, or songs that someone like me who is not a fan  were overexposed to."

I apologize for not being able to see in the future and see how you will change your point. I'll try to do better.  :thumbsup:

(and as soon as I figure out what ubiquitous means I will properly respond to your post)
Be the cliché you want to see in the world.

rincon

Quote from: Tracy 2112 on May 26, 2011, 08:57 PM
Quote from: rincon on May 26, 2011, 07:20 PM
Well, I did not do sales research. All I know is after Bad he had no ubiquitous presence in the media that was not negative, or songs that someone like me who is not a fan  were overexposed to.

Oh, OK. When you said "After Bad he (Michael Jackson) never had any real success", I thought you meant > after Bad he (Michael Jackson) never had any real success.

I was actually supposed to somehow magically read into your statement that what you meant was"after Bad he had no ubiquitous presence in the media that was not negative, or songs that someone like me who is not a fan  were overexposed to."

I apologize for not being able to see in the future and see how you will change your point. I'll try to do better.  :thumbsup:

(and as soon as I figure out what ubiquitous means I will properly respond to your post)
Really? Because I elaborate on a prior statement I made, you assume I expect you to read my mind? Lighten up.

Tracy 2112

Quote from: rincon on May 26, 2011, 11:24 PM
Quote from: Tracy 2112 on May 26, 2011, 08:57 PM
Quote from: rincon on May 26, 2011, 07:20 PM
Well, I did not do sales research. All I know is after Bad he had no ubiquitous presence in the media that was not negative, or songs that someone like me who is not a fan  were overexposed to.

Oh, OK. When you said "After Bad he (Michael Jackson) never had any real success", I thought you meant > after Bad he (Michael Jackson) never had any real success.

I was actually supposed to somehow magically read into your statement that what you meant was"after Bad he had no ubiquitous presence in the media that was not negative, or songs that someone like me who is not a fan  were overexposed to."

I apologize for not being able to see in the future and see how you will change your point. I'll try to do better.  :thumbsup:

(and as soon as I figure out what ubiquitous means I will properly respond to your post)
Really? Because I elaborate on a prior statement I made, you assume I expect you to read my mind? Lighten up.

Lighten up? How do you expect me to get a lame ass Lady Gaga thread over 5 pages if I lighten up?  ;)
Be the cliché you want to see in the world.

JaneCool

Not a fan.

And she's not original in the least, at least not musically. Outfits are interesting, but thinking about it even outrageous costumes are nothing new. So, on a scale of 1 to 10, I guess I'd give her a 2.
So, I do believe.....

YouAre_GivenToFly

Not a fan.

Being different for the sake of being different doesn't justify success or popularity, especially when her "different-ness" seems so contrived and reeks of trying too hard.

The wind blew me back, via Chicago, in the middle of the night.

MarkW

I think she's great*.  She has such a special connection with her fans.  And the shoes!  The hats!  Walking around wearing nothing but a net curtain and some tit tape!




* not really.  I just thought Tracy & I could probably get this to 20 pages if we took opposing sides.  ;)
The trouble with the straight and the narrow is it's so thin, I keep sliding off to the side

Tracy 2112

Quote from: MarkW on May 27, 2011, 08:57 AM
I think she's great*.  She has such a special connection with her fans.  And the shoes!  The hats!  Walking around wearing nothing but a net curtain and some tit tape!

What do you mean by tit tape?
Be the cliché you want to see in the world.

mjk73

Quote from: YouAre_GivenToFly on May 27, 2011, 12:43 AM
Not a fan.

Being different for the sake of being different doesn't justify success or popularity, especially when her "different-ness" seems so contrived and reeks of trying too hard.
1000000000% agreed

And Mark, tit tape? I think I might need some of that for my next marathon?

MarkW

This is from Wikipedia, so it is definitely correct:

Lingerie tape, also known as cleavage tape, fashion tape and tit tape, is a double-sided adhesive tape, used to secure the edges of a strapless dress or top to the cleavage or side of the breasts or on shoulders to secure bra straps from slipping, in order to keep the item of clothing in place and to avoid a wardrobe malfunction. It may also be referred to as toupee tape or wig tape, a similar double-sided tape intended for a different function (securing a hairpiece or merkin*).


You can see it in action here:


here:


and (less successfully) here, with Lady GaGa:


*In case you were wondering, a merkin is the technical term for a pubic wig.
The trouble with the straight and the narrow is it's so thin, I keep sliding off to the side

Taterbug

GAGA has to put tape over her nipples to keep them from falling off.

I can imagine her nipples  look like a doberman has been chewing on them.
"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle" Honest Abe

capt. scotty

Quote from: MarkW on May 27, 2011, 10:02 AM
This is from Wikipedia, so it is definitely correct:

Lingerie tape, also known as cleavage tape, fashion tape and tit tape, is a double-sided adhesive tape, used to secure the edges of a strapless dress or top to the cleavage or side of the breasts or on shoulders to secure bra straps from slipping, in order to keep the item of clothing in place and to avoid a wardrobe malfunction. It may also be referred to as toupee tape or wig tape, a similar double-sided tape intended for a different function (securing a hairpiece or merkin*).


You can see it in action here:


here:


and (less successfully) here, with Lady GaGa:


*In case you were wondering, a merkin is the technical term for a pubic wig.

#1, please
The thing is, Bob, it's not that I'm lazy, it's that I just don't care. - Peter Gibbons

megalicious

Quote from: ALady on May 26, 2011, 04:22 PM
Quote from: Ruckus on May 26, 2011, 01:43 PM
"stunningly homely" ;D

Nice Jaimoe

::)  Except she's really not.

Love her, love love love.  Y'all can suck it.

YES! With you on this one, ALady.
:-*
all facts begin as dreams dreamt by the wizard

BH

Don't really care for her style of music, but she's def. talented.   Plus she can actually sing live without lipsynching or adding huge amounts of computer help.   And she plays an instrument.   Several depending on your definition of instrument.
I'm digging, digging deep in myself, but who needs a shovel when you have a little boy like mine.

mjk73

Quote from: BH on Jun 02, 2011, 03:20 PM
Don't really care for her style of music, but she's def. talented.   Plus she can actually sing live without lipsynching or adding huge amounts of computer help.   And she plays an instrument.   Several depending on your definition of instrument.
skinflute count?

bowl of soup

Can she play her own skinflute?  I just blew my own mind.
I'm not saying it's easy...walking into sweet oblivion.

mjk73

Quote from: bowl of soup on Jun 02, 2011, 04:01 PM
Can she play her own skinflute?  I just blew my own mind.
I think so. I heard she had a rib removed to do it.  :-\

Taterbug

She's also very talented with the meat whistle  :D   
"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle" Honest Abe

Tracy 2112

Quote from: Taterbug on Jun 02, 2011, 04:41 PM
She's also very talented with the meat whistle  :D

Be the cliché you want to see in the world.

MarkW

There's a lot of testosterone in here, chaps.  Which is somewhat ironic in a Lady Gaga thread.
The trouble with the straight and the narrow is it's so thin, I keep sliding off to the side