Print Page - this months rolling stone.

Title: this months rolling stone.
Post by: whyteand82nd on Jul 28, 2008, 02:36 PM

On the cover: The Jones brothers.

I threw mine in my pool..the fished it out...then ripped it in half.

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Penny Lane on Jul 28, 2008, 02:45 PM

WHATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!! i'm sure i'll see it when i get home...they were on a roll this year....so much MMJ coverage, lots of bonnaroo stuff--now this? they were on a comeback? oh god. is jan wenner (sp?) still running that thing---ha ha--where is lester bangs when you need him

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Killgies on Jul 28, 2008, 03:05 PM

I thought for sure MMJ would of made the cover by now. It would of been nice to have it framed!

Rolling Stone is mostly crap these days anyways.

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: RockNRollJunkie on Jul 28, 2008, 03:13 PM

Ha I'm glad that I dont subscribe anymore to that. I just hang out at cvs and flip thru it. If it looks interesting I snatch out pages of it for later. I got tired of paying for 25 pages of unmusic related advertisements,5 pages about artists I dont care about and maybe one or two worth something.

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: B.B. on Jul 28, 2008, 03:22 PM

This just in: Rolling Stone sucks!

This is 1994, right?

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Penny Lane on Jul 28, 2008, 03:44 PM

QuoteThis just in: Rolling Stone sucks!

This is 1994, right?

yeah but lately they've been redeeming themselves with their love of MMJ--and run thru was #99--remember??! but otherwise, yeah, it's awful

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Jenny on Jul 28, 2008, 03:49 PM

hahahahhahhahahhahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahaha
etc

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Love Dogg on Jul 28, 2008, 04:40 PM

Quote
QuoteThis just in: Rolling Stone sucks!

This is 1994, right?

yeah but lately they've been redeeming themselves with their love of MMJ--and run thru was #99--remember??! but otherwise, yeah, it's awful

I agree. But they go and F it all up by putting...you know what, it doesn't matter. Rolling Stone isn't here to change what's happening, they are here to present it. They have to report what is being sold right now. And right now, what we love and want aren't being promoted.

I know when I open my Rolling Stone, most likely I will not be satisfied. And I have been surprised the last few months, with MMJ articles and Obama articles and Bonnaroo articles and I can always count on Austin Scaggs updating us on Kings of Leon...but for the most part, I'm disappointed.

Rolling Stone used to influence Pop Culture, now they are influenced BY Pop Culture. They're still the biggest dick in the music magazine business...they just don't have any balls.

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: BH on Jul 28, 2008, 04:53 PM

Oh wow, cake and mantooth are gonna freak.

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Jenny on Jul 28, 2008, 04:57 PM

i was gonna say!

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: ycartrob on Jul 28, 2008, 09:37 PM

this is not new; silly, crappy, bubblegum music has been coming from that magazine since day 1. Some days it's ok, some days it's not. But lately, it's been more crap than not. I stopped reading about 15 years ago.

David Cassidy Rolling Stone Magazine from May 11, 1972

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/images/catalog/detail/RS108-RS.jpg)

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: TEO on Jul 28, 2008, 09:46 PM

MMJ is mentioned once again is this issue.......

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: Penny Lane on Jul 28, 2008, 09:51 PM

QuoteMMJ is mentioned once again is this issue.......

where? i just read it cover to cover lol! how did i miss that?

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: ItStillJaimoe on Jul 28, 2008, 09:52 PM

Quotethis is not new; silly, crappy, bubblegum music has been coming from that magazine since day 1. Some days it's ok, some days it's not. But lately, it's been more crap than not. I stopped reading about 15 years ago.

David Cassidy Rolling Stone Magazine from May 11, 1972

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/images/catalog/detail/RS108-RS.jpg)

I agree, but Keith Partridge fighting with brother Danny and Reuben Kincade was fucking funny television back in the day and the humour still holds up well today.

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: TEO on Jul 28, 2008, 10:01 PM

Quote
QuoteMMJ is mentioned once again is this issue.......

where? i just read it cover to cover lol! how did i miss that?

top college records, 5 out of 10

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: ycartrob on Jul 28, 2008, 11:13 PM

Quote
Quotethis is not new; silly, crappy, bubblegum music has been coming from that magazine since day 1. Some days it's ok, some days it's not. But lately, it's been more crap than not. I stopped reading about 15 years ago.

David Cassidy Rolling Stone Magazine from May 11, 1972

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/images/catalog/detail/RS108-RS.jpg)

I agree, but Keith Partridge fighting with brother Danny and Reuben Kincade was fucking funny television back in the day and the humour still holds up well today.

true dat

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: ycartrob on Jul 28, 2008, 11:13 PM

(http://www.remax-premierservices.com/images/agents/alanmug.jpg)

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: whyteand82nd on Jul 29, 2008, 03:16 PM

Quote
QuoteMMJ is mentioned once again is this issue.......

where? i just read it cover to cover lol! how did i miss that?

HEY! at least you didnt throw yours in the pool!!

Title: Re: this months rolling stone.
Post by: The DARK on Jul 29, 2008, 05:22 PM

Don't let Ms. Mantooth read this thread... ;)

My Morning Jacket

Off-Topic => Other Music => Topic started by: whyteand82nd on Jul 28, 2008, 02:36 PM