Bans on same sex marriage.
Arizona
Yes, 1,039,606 - 56 percent
No, 801,279 - 44 percent
California
Yes, 5,163,908 - 52 percent
No, 4,760,336 - 48 percent
Florida
Yes, 4,662,558 - 62 percent
No, 2,851,598 - 38 percent
Arkansas: Bans gay and lesbian couples from adopting or being foster parents.
Yes, 573,774 - 57 percent
No, 434,344 - 43 percent
*I'm sorry, but I just don't see what's wrong about wanting to marry or start a family with the person you love.
well, I think the asnwer lies mainly with those who believe homosexuality is a sin.
I think the answer lies in civil unions rather than entering into the "holy" sanctity that is marriage.
One step at a time and I faith there are good people in this world. For the first time, I have faith.
Quotewell, I think the asnwer lies mainly with those who believe homosexuality is a sin.
I think the answer lies in civil unions rather than entering into the "holy" sanctity that is marriage.
Exactly, feel and treat people how a book tells you; it's that easy!
I am an attorney here in Miami, and the fact that the residents of my state voted to amend our state constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman is truly puzzling to me.
I am heterosexual. I do not understand the problems people have with homosexual individuals and couples having the same rights as everyone else. It does not diminish the special bond that one heterosexual spouse shares with their significant other. If anything, a strong homosexual "marriage" does more to support the idea of marriage than a weak hetero one. But, i digress.
My main beef with this is the fact that we in Florida have no AMENDED OUR CONSTITUTION. This thought is troubling. It is one thing to pass a law. It is one thing to pass an ordinance. But to amend a CONSTITUTION is another animal all together. Each state's constitution is the highest body of law, which governs the rest of that state's laws. The constitution is the magnifying glass under which all other proposed and in place laws are judged. Voting YES to define marriage as between a man and a woman in Florida's constitution is now a huge hurdle placed in front of same sex couple's attempts for equal rights in the future.
I can't help but think that our children and grandchildren will look back at us as a citizenship of a state and think, "wow, how backwards were they," the same way that i look at my grandparents and great grandparent's generation's views on african americans.
In the shadow of a black man being named president elect, a huge step forward for this country, we have taken a few steps back in our diminishment of equal rights under the law for homosexuals. And in doing so we have branded ourselves "ignorant" for our children and grandchildren to call us years down the road.
I hope that one day our country will be able to fulfill the promises made by our forefathers so many years ago. That all men are created equal under the eyes of the law and that a pursuit of happiness (even if that happiness is your love of someone of the same sex) should not be hindered by any man.
Until that day though, I will remain shameful of the choices my fellow Floridians have made and look forward to a time when all of this will just be another ugly chapter in our nations developmental history.
peace, love, freedom
haldon
LOL at the "sanctity" of marriage. i love how politicians toss this term around when most of them have their own issues with infidelity. hey, last time i checked--sleeping with someone besides the person to whom you're married is not upholding those "sacred" vows. but whatever, right?
i think what gets me most is banning same sex couples from adopting or being foster parents.
why? what LOGICAL reason is there for this? i can't think of one.
just fear and ignorance. as if being gay were "contagious," as if all homosexual people were deranged perverts who should not be allowed to be around kids, much less have them.
makes me SICK.
i agree completely. let the state do what it wants to do but AMENDING the constitution?! it seems like an episode of southpark or something. as for the 'it's not adam and steve' people, ii'm not wasting my breath
It is just silly....it is 2008. Let people do what they want to do.
Why should het couples be the only ones to enjoy this pain...I mean joy?
Yeah, marriage ceased to be a sacred institution when divorce rates started going through the roof.
Who gives a flying flip who you sleep with. Love the one you love.
two words: Larry Craig
QuoteI don't agree with it, does that make me a homophobe ? It's unfair to put a child thru the ridicule that they receive in school, children can be brutal. I have seen this first hand thru a buddy of mine who has lesbian parents. His parents were divorced when he was 11 and his mother found out she was a lesbian and her partner moved in. He has some deep emotional issues with his moms choice. And has alot of resentment from his childhood.
I know every situation is differant. And I'm sure there are good examples of gay parents. But the ones I have seen with my own eyes have had a negative effect on the children.
Just my observation.
How about the kid who is himself/herself gay?
What about the ridicule that kid feels from society telling him that he is not normal, he is sinful, his love is deficient, he is - by law - a second class citizen.
How's this working out for that kid.
Quote
California
Yes, 5,163,908 - 52 percent
No, 4,760,336 - 48 percent
I know, this is sad. The ad campaign in favor of Prop. 8 here in California was disgusting. The ads did not discuss the validity or morality of same-sex marriage itself, but PUSHED HARD on the fact that gay marriage WILL be taught in schools as a part of general health cirriculum (which is bullshit) unless our state constitution is ammended. So it was "save your children from moral corruption", not "gay marriage is wrong, because". And it worked...all these religious groups pumped in a record amount of cash for a social proposition to scare people into thinking they were protecting their children.
Taken from an article someone sent me...(State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell, former State Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin)
"The Yes on 8 ads are alarming and irresponsible," O'Connell said. "Our public schools are not required to teach about marriage. And, in fact, curriculum involving health issues is chosen by local school governing boards. No matter how you feel about marriage, we can all agree discrimination is wrong. That's why I'm voting no on 8."
"That ad is wrong. Not one person with any credibility has said otherwise," Eastin said. "Prop. 8 is about one thing, pure and simple, and that's taking away civil rights. Prop. 8 isn't about reading school books or teaching, it's about treating people differently - that is the one and only thing on the ballot."
"Prop 8 has nothing to do with education, and the proponents know it," Eastin continued. "Not one word in Prop 8 mentions education and no child can be forced, against the will of their parents, to attend any health-related class. California law prohibits it."Excuse me, but FUCK YOU CALIFORNIA RELIGIOUS RIGHT. YOUR PROP 8 AD CAMPAIGN WAS DISGUSTING.
It's a tough issue, and one that I really can't say I can take either side of. So :-X (I've just been looking for a chance to use that smiley)
QuoteI don't know, why don't you ask the peeps that tell him he is not normal. I only stated my buddies situation and how his mothers decision negatively effected my friends life. After his mothers revelation he struggled with his own sexuallity. Are these normal thoughts for an 11 year old ? or did his mothers decision cause him to re-assess his own sexuallity.
What is normal by the way ?
I agree completely - what is normal? who am I to say? why do I get to vote on the validity of people's marriages?
But I live in California and apparently we've decided that being gay is not normal because their marriages are now illegal and not recognized by mainstream "normal" society.
I suppose it comes down to if you think it's a choice or you think it's the way you're born. I don't think your friend's mom "decided" to be gay, because I don't think it's a choice. But I only have anecdotal evidence of this just like you. This is just my opinion. Sorry if I came off as shrill - I really didn't mean to. I just wanted to say that this campaign in California has been really ugly, and it's not just the kids of gay couples who are affected, but gay kids themselves.
I had my first crush in kindergarten. His name was Sean and I wanted to marry him and we were bride and groom for halloween. Most of my gay friends knew they were gay from a very young age. That's all I'm saying...
totally.
QuoteIt's Adam & Eve, NOT Adam & Steve. IMO
a) that's totally ignorant
b) what gives you the right to legislate it?
Quote I don't agree with it, does that make me a homophobe ? It's unfair to put a child thru the ridicule that they receive in school, children can be brutal. I have seen this first hand thru a buddy of mine who has lesbian parents. His parents were divorced when he was 11 and his mother found out she was a lesbian and her partner moved in. He has some deep emotional issues with his moms choice. And has alot of resentment from his childhood.
I know every situation is differant. And I'm sure there are good examples of gay parents. But the ones I have seen with my own eyes have had a negative effect on the children.
Just my observation.
And you don't know any straight parents who leave their children with deep emotional issues? I know a LOT of
bad straight parents and of the few same sex families I know a very large percentage seems to be doing fine with one and only one adult penis and one and only one adult vagina in the household. It's just silly, but very sad at the same time.
My attitude towards this and many things is, if it doesn't hurt you then get the fuck out of my business. (Not that I'm gay, but you get the point).
I hope there will be a day in this country when there is not an oppressed group of people but unfortunately we haven't evolved that far yet. Maybe that's why the people who hate homosexuals often are the very same people who fight the idea of evolution. :-? Nah, I've giving them too much credit.
QuoteI didn't detect any shrillness, It's a hot button issue. With no clear answer. Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm passing judgement. Our society is made up of a majority of people that are older and don't understand. They don't even give it a second thought because they were taught that it is sinful and you will burn in hell.
Gluttony one of the seven deadly sins. Should we make a constitutional ban against all-you-can eat buffets?
QuoteQuote I don't agree with it, does that make me a homophobe ? It's unfair to put a child thru the ridicule that they receive in school, children can be brutal. I have seen this first hand thru a buddy of mine who has lesbian parents. His parents were divorced when he was 11 and his mother found out she was a lesbian and her partner moved in. He has some deep emotional issues with his moms choice. And has alot of resentment from his childhood.
I know every situation is differant. And I'm sure there are good examples of gay parents. But the ones I have seen with my own eyes have had a negative effect on the children.
Just my observation.
And you don't know any straight parents who leave their children with deep emotional issues? I know a LOT of bad straight parents and of the few same sex families I know a very large percentage seems to be doing fine with one and only one adult penis and one and only one adult vagina in the household. It's just silly, but very sad at the same time.
My attitude towards this and many things is, if it doesn't hurt you then get the fuck out of my business. (Not that I'm gay, but you get the point).
I hope there will be a day in this country when there is not an oppressed group of people but unfortunately we haven't evolved that far yet. Maybe that's why the people who hate homosexuals often are the very same people who fight the idea of evolution. :-? Nah, I've giving them too much credit.
Sure, I'm a bad parent myself. I know first hand. ;)
Pathetic. :-/
QuoteA. calling me ignorant because my personal idea of marriage is between a man & women . why so bitter ?
B. If there was a ballot initiative in Illinois for civil unions I would have voted for it. I am not one to deny 2 people that love each other the same social benefits that I have.
If you want it to be legal than you need to change the current language of the state legislation. Currently in Illinois marriage is defined between a man and a women.
I don't think I could support gay adoption. I struggle with it. And it has nothing to do with religion. I am not a religious person whatsoever. I didn't make the laws, our founding fathers did. If you want to change the laws, call your state representative.
If you peeps wanna bash me for relating the story of a buddy of mine. Be my guest. I'm not here to change anybody's mind.
I think the reason it bothers so many people - the reason it bothers me - is because this never should have been on the ballot. THe founding fathers had nothing to say on this topic. Clinton signed DOMA - The Defense of Marriage Act to define marriage as being between a man and a woman in the eyes of the federal government - putting the burden on individual states. That is an incredibly recent, not remotely founding-fathery law, and it was put in place by the Christian Right.
You may not be religious, but the reason this movement has so much money and heat is because the religious right is behind it in force.
You may be against gay marriage, but here's the thing, it doesn't affect you - you shouldn't have a say any more than I should have a say in your marriage. I don't like people raising Christian fundamentalist children. I think it's a form of child abuse. Ideologically, it bothers me, and I think it harms the kids, but it is also, emphatically, not my call.
There is absolutely nothing offensive or wrong about who two consenting adults choose to love... it really never should've been on the ballot.
Taterbug, I hear what you're sayin', it's a good argument. I WISH we had Pro 8 ads as logical as your argument, then at least the REAL issue could've been decided on.
I have no problem with churches not recognizing gay marriage, but in a legal sense, give the gays the label of marriage, and the associated rights. I know it gets sticky with churches being vulnerable to discrimination suits for turning away gays who want to be married, and I'm no lawyer, but I don't think they should have to alter their core beliefs for this, and there should be an exception. Not sure how that would work...still working out those details with my advisors ;)
Adam and Eve have nothing to do with city hall, a marriage license, and tax exemptions, imo.
QuoteAdam and Eve have nothing to do with city hall, a marriage license, and tax exemptions, imo.
very, very well said
I see so many st8 families that adopt children or be foster families solely for the $$. I worked at a transitional living home for 17-21 year olds, and it was not uncommon to get a call from a young person saying their foster parents or adoptive parents were kicking them out as soon as they turned 18 (which usually was a month or so down the road), and it was unsaid, but it's b/c the parents would lose their benefits when the young person turned 18. So, these young people had their biological parents do a number on them, then their foster parents did a number on them, and they came to us really screwed up.
We really didn't have a chance and I know a couple that are now in the penetintiary. And these are amazing young people, too. I wonder what would have become of them raised in a more stable environment from day 1; I believe that can happen in a gay household.
And the same thing when I was a family therapist. Totally str8 couples (when you could find the dad) totally irresponsible with their children; from the wealthy to the poor. Over and over and over again.
I know a gay male couple (doctor and lawyer) who have adopted through a surrogate and they had twins; they're 5 now and the kids are amazing, the parents are loving, stable home, good school, no drug and alcohol use. I totally support it.
I also think unstable gay parents can screw up young people just as bad as str8 couples and they have no business adopting, or pulling a number on their kids (like Tater's friend). It's a huge issue, not real black and white.
Personally, though, I am getting a little sick and tired of agreeing with Dylan... this is like the 3rd time this year; maybe I'll start a Bengals thread ;)
(http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/es/science/lc/OUTREACH/BODresource/images%5C2cents2.jpg)
Reading over this old thread, I really wanted to reply as I'm a 42 year old man who is not only Gay, but have an amazing lifepartner, a very normal life and a 16 year old daughter who is incredibly well adjusted and LOVES our unique family unit. As do all her friends. Our home is one of support, encouragement, unconditional love, tolerance and shelter. There's NOTHING weird about us, except for the fact that unlike most STR8 families, we communicate openly on all matters including sexuality. No secrets = No lies. Unconventional or not. We have one hell of a happy family.
My Family Christmas 2010 (http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o244/DEJA-VU2006/familytree2.jpg)
Always having fun we are. (http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o244/DEJA-VU2006/jingletrio.jpg)
I have great admiration and respect for two people committed enough to each other that they go through with marriage. I know a few married gay couples and they are happy, healthy and contribute to the community (and the latter shouldn't be a requirement). Gay marriages take place in my town, Toronto, all the time and it is a non-issue to the point where its part of society. Even our newish right-wing mayor doesn't get involved. Gay marriages have been legal across Canada since 2005 and even our majority-fronted, closeted evangelical right-wing Conservative Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, said he won't be examining the issue again.
Anyway, gay is never going away and if two couples love each other, then let's make their matrimony legal. And isn't living together in sin, in a committed relationship, recognized as common law marriage anyway, so what's the dif?
Religion around the world, Catholicism included, has far more destructive and damning problems than worrying about gay marriages.
Amen. And Thank you (too). :-)
Lots of respect for you. Happy to see everything going well for you and your family. Does your daughter share in the Jacket love?
Forest Hill???
Quote from: The DARK on May 12, 2011, 10:29 AM
Lots of respect for you. Happy to see everything going well for you and your family. Does your daughter share in the Jacket love?
LOL!! OMG. I wish. She has gotten into the 70's and 80's rock thanks to Guitar Hero (which I won't touch. I think it's pure evil. LOL) and digs the "rocker chick" style but she thinks The Jacket are a bunch of boring, hairy, unwashed guys who play music that makes no sense to her. I'm taking her to a show this summer though, so Jim and co. may work their magic on her live. Then again I won't notice what she's doing through the stars in my eyes and ears. IS IT NATURAL TO LOVE A BAND THIS MUCH???? My God.... This feels so good.