"One Big Holiday" in MEXICO!!

Started by parkervb, Jun 11, 2013, 01:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Crayton09

Quote from: jaye on Feb 04, 2014, 11:20 PM
Quote from: Crayton09 on Feb 04, 2014, 10:51 PM
Quote from: dontgetupset on Feb 04, 2014, 07:19 PM
Greetings all. I have been lurking here for years. Was with you at T5 and the Cap, had magical experiences at both, and love this band as much as y'all do.

Let me also say that, like others, it was only due to family issues (i.e. who will watch my kids etc...) that it became an impossibility. The whole experience sounds like it was as truly amazing as everyone has described it. I also have been checking livedownloads every day to see when these soundboards will be available.

However, these most recent posts about the covers are touching that I have been thinking about on and off since night 1 and that is: Shouldn't these shows have been a little better? Like when your most passionate fans are paying literally thousands of dollars with the primary purpose being to see their favorite band shouldn't there be numerous unprecedented moments?

-Covers. The covers aspect has been covered in these last few posts but yes the bananas thing is very NOT spontaneous and we have all basically seen one of the other covers in one way or another. Instead of covers that they have covered on soundtracks and other collections why not 3 covers that nobody has every heard from Jim's lips? I know that that woudl require rehearsal but that goes back to the thousands of dollars thing.

-New songs. I was as Phish Halloween this year (unfortunately) and I was included in those that were PISSED that they "covered themselves". That being said nobody would propose that the boys bust out the new album in  its entirety (though that would have been awesome) but why not a few of the most completed songs? I wouyldn't be writing this if they weren't JUST coming from the studio...

-Bust outs. I love the song El Caporal and especially with the whole Spanish element it would have been a very appropriate song to have played there. Anybody can pick the Tenn. Fire or At Dawn stuff they would have liked to hear but again this should have been like nothing else.

-Longer Sets- I know this has also been touched on but I was really really surprised that even with 4 am end times that the sets were as short as they were. The sets were almost identical in length to Port Chester and those shows were without a doubt a great length, however, a) this was an MMJ resort in the middle of Mexico when nobody had anywhere to go and b) they coulda pulled a Pearl Jam / Wilco at Solid Sound and done a 30-40 song set (I know, I know with 20 minute Dondante you cant have 40 songs but I think you know what I mean by this).

People on this board will have the knee-jerk reaction to me saying "some people will never be satisfied" but I (obviously) think my points are kinda valid and that other people feel the same way. I genuinely wish I could have been there and I'm sure that right now 10 days removed I would feel the same exact way as pretty much everyone here and, yes, it probably would have been the time of my life but that doesn't mean we can't have a discussion about those things that may have made the concerts themselves 95's instead of 99/100's. If there is a 2015/2016 OBH I am in but I'd at least hope there'll be a little more that would blow my mind.

you'll feel like these shows could've been better? didn't you say you weren't even there? you didn't experience the energy and the way the songs were played, you looked at a setlist dude. and if your judging Jacket shows by setlist and song selection rather than the overall experience then you're missing the point. I think a lot of people are missing the point by getting so hung up on setlists and hearing what THEY WANT to hear. stop complaining and be happy, it's a lot more fun.

I was there, had an amazing time, I'm totally happy - but I love to talk about set lists - what I like, don't like, which songs were amazing back to back, which covers I don't like, - It's not complaining.  It might be super over the top geek stuff but it's definitely not complaining.  It's just what some of us do. 

Sure a show could have been better.  (I thought Night 2 was better than Night 1).  Or it could have been a 35 song set.  Maybe someone else thought there was too much old stuff and not enough Circuital.   None of that is complaining!  If you don't want to discuss that kind of stuff, then don't - but don't accuse people who like to of being unhappy, hung up, missing the point complainers.   :grin:

Re the band being around - Besides the rumor that Jim was having a back problem, there is no way he could have walked around.  Did you see those pics of the crowded pool areas?  It would have been nuts.  He would have been surrounded by people - some wanting to take pictures with him, some wanting to read him their poems, sign their boobs,  whatever.  It would have been really hard for him to cut it off.  Carl & Bo came out at a fairly quiet time and tons of people got pics with them.   I don't know - I didn't expect it at all.
hey, I call em' how I see em' and it sounds like a bunch of complaining and people being hung up on setlists and songs THEY WANT to hear, and I don't really care, but try looking at a show as a whole experience and not songs you do and don't want to hear. that's just my opinion. I don't give a shit if anyone critiques a show, but this dude wasn't even there and says the shows could've been better. fuckin' laughable! jaja

Crispy

Quote from: Fully on Feb 05, 2014, 05:06 AM
If not posting because this stuff gets on your nerves, you know what to do.
This?

"...it's gonna be great -- I mean me coming back with the band and playing all those hits again"

bartel

people complaining about OBH are out of their mind.

JTG1975

My biggest complaint is I never got to pull off the roof top hot tub orgy I had dreamed about. Now I'm stuck with all these robes and lotions.

ericm

Quote from: bartel on Feb 05, 2014, 11:08 AM
people complaining about OBH are out of their mind.

Disagree. It's a forum/message board and people are entitled to their opinions. It's not always going to be roses, and perfume around here, and shouldn't be,IMO.

Complaining just to complain is one thing, but voicing what they feel is a warranted gripe is fine. If someone who was there didn't have the same experience as someone else, or had a gripe, why do they have to be out of their mind? Sure, some of us would've loved to have been there, and that would've been enough to make us happy, no matter what else happened but not everyone is like that. Doesn't make them out of their minds.
"Where's Jim going?"

bartel

Quote from: ericm on Feb 05, 2014, 11:52 AM
Quote from: bartel on Feb 05, 2014, 11:08 AM
people complaining about OBH are out of their mind.

Disagree. It's a forum/message board and people are entitled to their opinions. It's not always going to be roses, and perfume around here, and shouldn't be,IMO.

Complaining just to complain is one thing, but voicing what they feel is a warranted gripe is fine. If someone who was there didn't have the same experience as someone else, or had a gripe, why do they have to be out of their mind? Sure, some of us would've loved to have been there, and that would've been enough to make us happy, no matter what else happened but not everyone is like that. Doesn't make them out of their minds.

You know what I take back what I said... I agree with you 100%... People are allowed to voice their opinion whatever that may be. But, I do think sometimes people who don't go are jealous and say the show wasn't as good as.. (for example port chester) and use this a defense mechanism for their jealousy.

walterfredo

I wasn't there, really wish we could have made it...and from all accounts, photos, videos, etc. sounds and looks like an amazing time was had by all.  We will make EVERY attempt to attend if they do this again.

that said, I really do feel like 'dontgetupset' (great name by the way re your comments!) has some very valid points.  I must admit I was a bit surprised too by the lack of some excitement with the setlists.  Obviously one cannot judge the awesomeness factor of any show by the setlist.  But...you can certainly make comments, and be entitled to your opinions.  As stated, people traveled great distances and paid exorbitant amounts of money to see their favorite band in such a unique environment...throw them a musical bone!  Like others have said, many of the covers are so played out.  Really can't believe they did the whole careless whisper, banana thing again.  I saw the first two times they did it...Fillmore SF NYE and T5, and gotta admit when they started doing it at T5 it immediately took away from some of the magic that occurred at the Fillmore.   Expectations were obviously sky high for OBH though, and that can really come back to bite you sometimes. 

I can't wait to hear the OBH recordings though, all comments above aside, I still wish we could have pulled it off and joined in the craziness.  I'm glad everyone had an amazing time, and the hotel issues were almost a non-issue.  Hope to make the next one!

(and I agree with everything ericm said)

BigHerm

Didn't they play 2.5 hours  3 nights? Give the boys a break  :tongue:


rincon2

Quote from: bartel on Feb 05, 2014, 12:10 PM
Quote from: ericm on Feb 05, 2014, 11:52 AM
Quote from: bartel on Feb 05, 2014, 11:08 AM
people complaining about OBH are out of their mind.

Disagree. It's a forum/message board and people are entitled to their opinions. It's not always going to be roses, and perfume around here, and shouldn't be,IMO.

Complaining just to complain is one thing, but voicing what they feel is a warranted gripe is fine. If someone who was there didn't have the same experience as someone else, or had a gripe, why do they have to be out of their mind? Sure, some of us would've loved to have been there, and that would've been enough to make us happy, no matter what else happened but not everyone is like that. Doesn't make them out of their minds.

You know what I take back what I said... I agree with you 100%... People are allowed to voice their opinion whatever that may be. But, I do think sometimes people who don't go are jealous and say the show wasn't as good as.. (for example port chester) and use this a defense mechanism for their jealousy.
I remember comments made about night 2 at the Wiltern by folks not there saying it was a week set list. Not to anyone I know who was there. It was almost surreal in it's contrast of night one, and the most unique MMJ show I have seen. Now Gibson at Universal was a strange unsatisfying show.

dontgetupset

Hi everyone. Been dealing with a power outage so wasn't able to respond (I know you were all eagerly awaiting).

In no way do I discount those that think that these were the three greatest shows of all time and I hope that tolerance is reciprocated. The point was made about crowd energy and I fully understand how- from a fan's perspective- the crows energy is not even capable of being replicated. That is from a FAN's perspective though. Nothing will change the fact that I think the BAND could have done more.

I agree with the whole Jim being swarmed thing- its really not worth debating the band's interaction with the crowd that paid about 3-4 million dollars to be there. I would like to think that Jim could have played Wayne Coyne's role in MCing something or judging a contest (or showing his face at the dance party) but I would not have posted anything if I only felt that Jim was mildly introverted.

My main thing and I am sticking to it is that if pearl Jam can do a 4 hour + shows and if Springsteen can do the same for like 40 nights straight at age 60 at Giants Stadium I would have thought this band could have finished off the 3 nights with a surprise full 3rd set or an extra hour of playing etc...

If I could do it all over again I would have gone knowing everything I know now but hopefully somebody from Cloud9 peruses these forums and to the same extent that they are probably leaning more and more with each event (for example I imagine that they will NEVER contract with an unfinished hotel in a 3rd world country after all of the anxiety (whether realized or unrealized))  so too they may read this healthy respectful conversation amongst friends and realize they may need to push their bands for a little more.

Crayton09

Quote from: dontgetupset on Feb 05, 2014, 01:15 PM
Hi everyone. Been dealing with a power outage so wasn't able to respond (I know you were all eagerly awaiting).

In no way do I discount those that think that these were the three greatest shows of all time and I hope that tolerance is reciprocated. The point was made about crowd energy and I fully understand how- from a fan's perspective- the crows energy is not even capable of being replicated. That is from a FAN's perspective though. Nothing will change the fact that I think the BAND could have done more.

I agree with the whole Jim being swarmed thing- its really not worth debating the band's interaction with the crowd that paid about 3-4 million dollars to be there. I would like to think that Jim could have played Wayne Coyne's role in MCing something or judging a contest (or showing his face at the dance party) but I would not have posted anything if I only felt that Jim was mildly introverted.

My main thing and I am sticking to it is that if pearl Jam can do a 4 hour + shows and if Springsteen can do the same for like 40 nights straight at age 60 at Giants Stadium I would have thought this band could have finished off the 3 nights with a surprise full 3rd set or an extra hour of playing etc...

If I could do it all over again I would have gone knowing everything I know now but hopefully somebody from Cloud9 peruses these forums and to the same extent that they are probably leaning more and more with each event (for example I imagine that they will NEVER contract with an unfinished hotel in a 3rd world country after all of the anxiety (whether realized or unrealized))  so too they may read this healthy respectful conversation amongst friends and realize they may need to push their bands for a little more.
YOU WERE NOT THERE DUDE! So how are you going to act like you were? Forget about the crowd energy, you don't understand the energy the band was playing with. How could the band do more if you can't even comprehend what they gave in the first place considering you weren't there?

dontgetupset

Firstly, and I don't know where I heard this once but dontgetupset.

I am only referring to those things that can be gleaned from the videos available, written reports, and setlists.

The qualitative aspects of what I have critiqued are not targeted at what WAS played. It has to do with certain objective standards that those that see a lot of live music can all agree on. A 45 minute stand alone concert is a joke and unheard of. An 8 hour concert is unheard of (barring Phish 12/31/99). In this case they probably met expectations: about 21 songs in 2.5 hours. Again, in purely quantifiable terms I, when I still thought I might be going, thought they would blow people's minds with a Pearl Jam-esque 40 songs in 4+ hours show. Its fine that they blew people's minds with the energy but that that would happen was a given with this band- thats one of the reasons we like them so.

I stick to what I say. I expected something DARING and from what I see that didn't happen. Nevertheless, dontgetupset.

rincon2

Theoretically they could have played longer. Theoretically they could have played different stuff, and/or new stuff. Was I or anyone I was around concerned with any of that? No fuckin way. It was all what we imagined. (If I can speak for those who shared nothing but positive things to me).

Woldie

Crayton09 - did we meet outside the Cancun airport post-OBH and chat about posters and alternative poster distribution?
"The owls are not what they seem."

justbcuzido

Quote from: dontgetupset on Feb 05, 2014, 02:10 PM
Firstly, and I don't know where I heard this once but dontgetupset.

I am only referring to those things that can be gleaned from the videos available, written reports, and setlists.

The qualitative aspects of what I have critiqued are not targeted at what WAS played. It has to do with certain objective standards that those that see a lot of live music can all agree on. A 45 minute stand alone concert is a joke and unheard of. An 8 hour concert is unheard of (barring Phish 12/31/99). In this case they probably met expectations: about 21 songs in 2.5 hours. Again, in purely quantifiable terms I, when I still thought I might be going, thought they would blow people's minds with a Pearl Jam-esque 40 songs in 4+ hours show. Its fine that they blew people's minds with the energy but that that would happen was a given with this band- thats one of the reasons we like them so.

I stick to what I say. I expected something DARING and from what I see that didn't happen. Nevertheless, dontgetupset.


UMMMM NO!!

First off, minds were blown, so sorry to disappoint you there. Sure they could have played 10 hours, but the time they did play was awe inspiring as it is.

Second to your previous comments about Cloud 9. I spoke with several people about the HRH, and they loved doing it there and plan on doing it again (not just for Jacket). Aside from the average food, the resort was great.

Also, Cloud 9 didn't limit the bands time they played. I was told by Cloud 9 that the band decided on those time slots and further more they had to fit in the late night sets.

I can agree that the first night they played (with no openers or late night set), they could've gone longer. They didn't and that was perfect. That set was absolutely flawless. Throughout my time there I never heard a single negative thing about any of the shows by anyone present. No one bitched that they should have stayed on longer. It was perfect as is.

I would not have changed a single thing about my experience. Would I like to have heard different songs/covers etc?? Sure. However, I appreciate what was, I don't gloat on what could have been.

In qualitative aspects, they fucking killed it and melted everyones faces. Hell, I think the craziest the crowd got was during Holding Onto Black Metal... A lot of people tend to hate on that tune, but I have never seen a Jacket crowd go as nuts as they did during a song as that one.

I wish you could have been there.
Mona Lisa must'a had the highway blues, you can tell by the way she smiles.

walterfredo

One thing I have come to learn about MMJ fans over nearly a decade of seeing them...they don't seem to take kindly to even the smallest amounts of band critique.  I actually find this characteristic to be quite endearing! 

Crayton09

Quote from: dontgetupset on Feb 05, 2014, 02:10 PM
Firstly, and I don't know where I heard this once but dontgetupset.

I am only referring to those things that can be gleaned from the videos available, written reports, and setlists.

The qualitative aspects of what I have critiqued are not targeted at what WAS played. It has to do with certain objective standards that those that see a lot of live music can all agree on. A 45 minute stand alone concert is a joke and unheard of. An 8 hour concert is unheard of (barring Phish 12/31/99). In this case they probably met expectations: about 21 songs in 2.5 hours. Again, in purely quantifiable terms I, when I still thought I might be going, thought they would blow people's minds with a Pearl Jam-esque 40 songs in 4+ hours show. Its fine that they blew people's minds with the energy but that that would happen was a given with this band- thats one of the reasons we like them so.

I stick to what I say. I expected something DARING and from what I see that didn't happen. Nevertheless, dontgetupset.
Firstly, I'm not upset, just highly annoyed with your assumption of what the Band gave. You weren't there so you don't know, you don't know how many times Carl scissor kicked like a madman while strumming the shit out of his guitar, you don't know how Jim reached out to the crowd and made piercing eye contact, you  didn't see Tom's mind being blown while Bob was on  stage,  you didn't see Pat play like you've never  seen him before, and you didn't  have  Bo treat you like an old friend  when you ran into him  going to the cheeseburger buffet late night. So please don't make assumptions about something you really don't know about. Oh and Pearl Jam and Phish could play 24 hour long shows and it still wouldn't be as good as a 2.5 hour Jacket show.

Crayton09

Quote from: Woldie on Feb 05, 2014, 02:12 PM
Crayton09 - did we meet outside the Cancun airport post-OBH and chat about posters and alternative poster distribution?
Quite possibly, can you be more specific? I was operating on very little sleep that day so my memory isn't the greatest. Jaja

Vitz

The shows were clearly billed as 3 shows with beginning and end times.  Expecting more than that is rather silly, especially since other things were scheduled.  What we got was everything we could have asked for and more.  They are still pushing the limits of what can be expected and breaking new ground.  It is an incredible thing to be witness to.

Woldie

I ALWAYS want more!  After Bonnaroo '08, after Port Chester.. always.  But only AmericanaRama SLC left me even slightly dissatisfied.  And that was just barely!

-Greedy, satisfied summabitch
"The owls are not what they seem."